Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-03-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.33 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MT6781 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, having a global score of 94.6 against 72.6. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version while Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro has Android 12. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and a lot heavier than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, it's design is still somewhat thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little better display density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro, although it has a lot less mega-pixels back-facing camera, they both have the same aperture. Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro has a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi POCO M4 Pro features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.