Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-11 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than Xiaomi Poco X2's general score of 79.3. The iPhone X design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Poco X2, even though it was released 2 years before. IPhone X features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The iPhone X has a better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and videos and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The iPhone X has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.