Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-11 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco X2, getting a score of 84.2 against 79.3. Despite of the fact that iPhone XS is older than Xiaomi Poco X2, it's body is lighter and thinner. The Apple iPhone XS has a quite superior performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone XS has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a quite greater screen density. Xiaomi Poco X2 takes much better photographs and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Apple iPhone XS and Xiaomi Poco X2 both feature quite similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have equal internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco X2 features a much better battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.