Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X2's general score of 79.3. The Google Pixel 3 is an older phone than Xiaomi Poco X2, but it is lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit higher screen pixels density.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X2, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Google Pixel 3 and Xiaomi Poco X2 have very similar storage capacity for applications and games, both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X2 captures way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a way more MP back camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.