Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X2, with a score of 89 against 79.3. Even though the Google Pixel 5 and Xiaomi Poco X2 were only released 8 months apart, the Google Pixel 5 is notably lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
The Google Pixel 5 has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.