Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-02-11 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 has a global score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than the HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. Xiaomi Poco X2 is a incredibly newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than the HTC One M9, but it is also a lot heavier. These devices work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco X2 has a more recent 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version.
The HTC One M9 counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a bit better pixel quantity per inch of display. HTC One M9 counts with a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processor and a graphics co-processor.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 captures better videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a larger camera aperture for better low light photos and video, a much larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The HTC One M9 counts with slightly more memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 128 GB. Xiaomi Poco X2 has a much longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.