Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X2, with an 81.3 score against 79.3. LG V35 ThinQ's body is much lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X2, although it was released only 20 months before. The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X2. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has improved battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a very superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a much larger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.