Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-11 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. These phones have Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco X2 has the previous 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Xiaomi Poco X2 construction is newer than Moto Z Force's, although it's notably heavier and thicker.
The Moto Z Force has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of 2200 MHz cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X2 features better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh. The Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.