Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-11 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a 79.3 score against 75.8. These phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco X2 has the previous 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The Xiaomi Poco X2 is a a little thinner and a little lighter phone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although they were only released with a couple of months difference.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a display with the same size. The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has an 11% greater battery size. Xiaomi Poco X2 has a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera, faster video frame rates and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.