Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-11 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Sonic silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 has a general score of 79.3, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 general score. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco X2 has a more recent 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10. Xiaomi Poco X2's design is a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S, although both of them were released only a couple months apart.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X2, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, they both have a screen with the same size. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a bigger aperture and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a battery performance that is very similar to Xiaomi Poco X2's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.