Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-02-11 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X2, with a overall score of 84.6 against 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy F23 is a much newer phone, and it is also just a bit thinner and a lot lighter than the Xiaomi Poco X2. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy F23 has the newer 12 version and Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11, counting with a couple nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy F23 has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2408 pixels and a little more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.