Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-11 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X2's score of 79.3. Galaxy S10e is an older device than the Xiaomi Poco X2, but it is lighter and thinner anyway. The Galaxy S10e has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy S10e has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco X2. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 45 percent more battery size. Xiaomi Poco X2 features a better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing images in low light environments and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.