Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-02-11 | -- |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X2, getting a overall score of 80.9 against 79.3. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S6 Active has an older 5.0 version while Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11 version. Galaxy S6 Active counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processor and an extra graphics processor.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a way better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Xiaomi Poco X2 takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a same size aperture and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also has a much bigger camera sensor and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.