Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-02-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco X2's 79.3 score. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is way thicker and heavier than Xiaomi Poco X2.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X2 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the Xiaomi Poco X2 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.