Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-11 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is better than the Xiaomi Poco X2's 79.3 global score. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Poco X2, even when both of them were released only 0 months apart.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X2 features longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.