Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-11 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco X2's score of 79.3. Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is newer, somewhat lighter and way thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X2. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X2 features better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.