Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-11 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X2, having a general score of 92.3 against 79.3. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should offer identical OS features. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lighter and thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco X2, although both of them were only released with a couple of months difference.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2636px resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Poco X2 takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos and video in low light environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a lot better resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.