Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-11 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X2's general score of 79.3. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xiaomi Poco X2 were released with only 7 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is incredibly heavier but notably thinner. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide you all the same OS features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a battery duration that is just as good as the Xiaomi Poco X2 one. The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos or videos in low-light environments and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels and a bigger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.