Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-11 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Xiaomi Poco X2, with a 90.6 score against 79.3. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and way thinner device than Xiaomi Poco X2, although it's also a lot heavier.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a screen that is very similar to Xiaomi Poco X2's display, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a quite bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger aperture for better low light images and video. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Poco X2 has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.