Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting an 83.3 score against 81.6. IPhone 11 is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but it is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter anyway. IPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC works with Android 10 operating system.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit sharper display than Apple iPhone 11, because although it has way less brightness, it also counts with a little bit bigger display, a better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little more pixels per inch of screen. The iPhone 11 features a quite superior processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 11, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs and a camera with way more MP.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much better battery life than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.