Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's score of 81.6. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 operating system. Despite of the fact iPhone 11 Pro Max is older and just a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, it's body is still somewhat thinner.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a superior processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel number per inch in the display, a lot brighter display and a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes much better videos and photos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 30 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.