Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a score of 87.1 against 81.6. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is an notably older device than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but Apple could make it somewhat thinner and just a little lighter anyway. The iPhone 8 Plus features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixel amount per display inch and more brightness.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The iPhone 8 Plus has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much larger sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and a camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better battery duration than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 92 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.