Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with an 88.1 score against 81.6. Despite of the fact that iPhone X is older than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, it's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter. The Apple iPhone X has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more brightness, a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Apple iPhone X features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.