Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 overall score. IPhone XR's construction is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, despite of the fact that it was released around 23 months before. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little bit better display than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has much darker screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixels amount per display inch, a bit bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Apple iPhone XR counts with a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and 2 lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 75 percent bigger battery size. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes better pictures and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or video in low light situations and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.