Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting a overall score of 84.2 against 81.6. The Apple iPhone XS body is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even though it was released 2 years before. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1125 x 2436px resolution, a little bit better number of pixels in each inch in the display and more brightness.
IPhone XS counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much better camera than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much better 64 MP resolution camera and a much bigger sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 94% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.