Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is slightly better than Google Pixel, having a general score of 81.6 against 80.2. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design is newer, but just a little bit thicker and a lot heavier than Google Pixel. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a way larger display.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a little bit better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures, a camera with lot more megapixels and a lot bigger sensor capturing way higher quality photographs.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.