Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting an 82.5 score against 81.6. The Google Pixel 2 XL is an a lot older cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but it is thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Google Pixel 2 XL features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a greater camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features slightly more storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.