Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a, getting an 81.6 score against 78.8. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design is newer, but notably heavier and somewhat thicker than the Google Pixel 3a. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit inferior pixel quantity in each display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5160mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.