Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, having a general score of 81.6 against 78.9. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 version. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a newer phone than the Google Pixel 3a XL, but it is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has just a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit larger screen. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way larger camera sensor and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.