Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with a general score of 92.1 against 81.6. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version, so it gives you some nice extra features. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's body is way newer and just a little thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's, but it's also just a little heavier.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has way more brightness, a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of display, a little higher resolution of 1280 x 2800 pixels and a little larger display. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 960 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a bit better processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a worse video definition and a back camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a much larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.