Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a global score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 overall score. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the newer 10 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's design is way newer and a little thinner than HTC One M9's, although it's also incredibly heavier.
The HTC One M9 counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory.
The HTC One M9 has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a graphics co-processor. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a really longer battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has an 82 percent greater battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images, a lot bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a back camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.