Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 89.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Huawei |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-11-15 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.35 x 5.76 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 10.41 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 2299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 980 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G76 MP10 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate X is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a general score of 89.4 against 81.6. Huawei Mate X's construction is older, somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Huawei Mate X has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit more vivid display than Huawei Mate X, although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, a quite smaller screen and a quite inferior number of pixels per inch of screen. The Huawei Mate X has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Huawei Mate X also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Huawei Mate X counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes much clearer photos and videos than Huawei Mate X, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and videos in low light situations, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a bit better battery performance than Huawei Mate X, because it has a 15% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.