Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with a global score of 81.6 against 81.3. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a noticeably newer phone than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it's way heavier and much thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater screen density.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a very superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes greater photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a way bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.