Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting an 87.6 score against 81.6. Although LG V60 ThinQ and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC were released only 6 months apart, the LG V60 ThinQ design is a little bit heavier but just a bit thinner than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V60 ThinQ has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has just a bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit inferior pixel quantity per inch in the display and a little bit smaller screen. LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit better battery performance than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same resolution back-facing camera, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.