Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting a general score of 87.1 against 81.6. LG Velvet's design is lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although both of them were released with only a few months difference. The LG Velvet and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC have quite similar CPUs, they have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little more vivid display than LG Velvet, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little smaller display and a little less pixels per inch in the display. The LG Velvet features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has greater battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 20% larger battery size. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little bit better camera than LG Velvet, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back and a bigger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.