Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a bit better than Moto G Power, having an 81.6 score against 76.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has 10 version and Moto G Power has Android 11. Although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and Moto G Power were released with only a few months difference, Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's body is a little bit heavier but also just a little bit thinner.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Moto G Power has a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G Power also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit superior battery life than Moto G Power, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking pictures or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.