Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-09-08 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a general score of 81.6, which is slightly better than Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has the older 10 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a a lot newer cellphone than Moto Z Force, but it's way heavier and way thicker.
Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater screen pixels density. The Moto Z Force features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto Z Force also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 47 percent more battery size. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a greater camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.