Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a overall score of 81.6 against 76.4. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a notably newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it is extremely thicker and noticeably heavier. Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit better processing unit than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 47 percent more battery size.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes greater pictures and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.