Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, getting a global score of 81.6 against 76.3. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design is way newer, but heavier and a lot thicker than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a little better performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a superior battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 72% larger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a very superior camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.