Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's overall score of 81.6. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although both were released only 1 months apart. These devices include Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit higher amount of pixels per screen inch, a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit larger display.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Motorola razr (2020) has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a very superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has an 84% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.