Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a global score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's overall score of 76.2. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner phone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, even though both were released with only 0 months difference. These phones use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels quantity per display inch and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, and they both have a screen of the same size, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with more brightness.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same back camera sensor size and a same resolution camera, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture to take better low light photos.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit better battery performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.