Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with an 83.1 score against 81.6. These phones work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Although OPPO Find X2 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC were released only 4 months apart, OPPO Find X2 Pro is just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater count of pixels per screen inch, a much brighter display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has much more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with better battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro's camera is just as good as Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's camera, because although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a back camera with lot less MP resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.