Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a global score of 83.8 against 81.6. The Galaxy A50 construction is thinner and incredibly lighter than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger display. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos and a lot better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.