Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 overall score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has a newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10, so it provides you a lot of extra features. The Galaxy A51 5G body is lighter and a little thinner than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even though both were only released with a couple of months difference.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much better storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5160mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.