Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with a score of 88.1 against 81.6. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version. The Galaxy F62 is a just a little heavier phone than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but both are 0.37inches thick.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a higher number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy F62 and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC have very similar displays, and although the Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit opaque display, they both have a better pixels count in each inch in the screen, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a display of the same size.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy F62, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, they both have a camera in the back with a 64 mega pixels, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a 0.59 inches camera sensor and the same video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a 36% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.