Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with a 97.6 score against 81.6. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version, counting with lots of additional features and some performance improvements. Galaxy Fold is an older and way heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but Samsung managed to build it noticeably thinner anyway.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit greater screen pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a much smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a way more mega-pixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5160mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.