Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, with a general score of 98.9 against 81.6. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 version, offering a couple additional features. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although both were released with only 1 months difference.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little bigger display and a higher pixel density. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments, a way more mega-pixels camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 15 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.