Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having a overall score of 89 against 81.6. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is an older phone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but it's way lighter and thinner anyway. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.