Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's global score of 81.6. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10, so it gives you a lot of extra features. Samsung Galaxy S10 is an older phone than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but it's extremely lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a higher screen pixels density. The Galaxy S10 has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.