Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Cobalt blue and Shadow gray | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's overall score of 81.6. The Samsung Galaxy S10e design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although it was released a little bit over a year before. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel count in each inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 66% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.